Legal Opinion
United Video Buyers Ass'n v. North Penn Transfer, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 27, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
KING, P.J.A.D.
This case involves the right of a consignor of cargo to recover against the carrier where the consignor’s bill of lading was not filled out strictly in accordance with the applicable federal tariff regulations. The case is here on our grant of leave to appeal from the denial of a summary judgment motion by the carrier, North Penn Transfer, Inc. (North Penn). R. 2:2-4. We disagree with the ruling of the Law Division judge and reverse the order denying summary judgment.
The facts are essentially uncontroverted. Plaintiff, United Video Buyers…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Davis v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Johnson & Dealaman, Inc. v. Wm. F. Hegarty, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Empire Box Corp. of Stroudsburg v. Delaware, L. & W. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Upjohn Company v. TimpanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Comark, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. World Time Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- United Video Buyers Ass'n v. North Penn Transfer, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- United Video Buyers Ass'n v. North Penn Transfer, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987