United Video Buyers Ass'n v. North Penn Transfer, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentHandler, J.
Plaintiff, United Video Buyers Association (“UVB”), had an agreement with North Penn Transfer, Inc. (“NPT”) to ship video recorders on a “Collect on Delivery” (“C.O.D.”) basis. The eight bills of lading prepared by plaintiff failed to comply, however, with federal Rule of Freight Classification 190, which requires that the letters “C.O.D.” be affixed before the name of the consignee and remittance instructions be properly filled out, in default of which the consignor (in this case NPT) has no duty to accept the shipments on a C.O.D. basis. In this case, the bills of lading clearly noted that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Cermetek, Inc., a Corporation v. Butler Avpak, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Davis v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Taisho Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. v. The Vessel "Gladiolus"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Empire Box Corp. of Stroudsburg v. Delaware, L. & W. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.