Legal Opinion
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. World Time Corp. of America
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 21, 1990No. 89-0012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
We reverse the summary final judgment entered in favor of World Time Corporation and remand with instructions to enter summary final judgment in favor of United Parcel Service.
The reversal is determined on three factors. First, United Parcel Service had no duty to collect cash or cashier’s checks from the consignee. The alleged instructions given to United Parcel by World Time were not made in writing as required by the tariff governing United Parcel’s treatment of C.O.D. packages. See Comark Inc. v. United Parcel Service, 701 F.Supp. 641 (N.D.Ill.1988); United Video Buyers Association v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Comark, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Streiff Jewelry Co. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987
- Compuknit Industries, Inc. v. Mercury Motors Express, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Silver Creations, Ltd. v. United Parcel Serv.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- STREIFF JEWELRY CO., INC. v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Computel, Inc., a Florida Corp. v. Emery Air Freight Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Dana Kaskel v. Northern Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Computel, Inc., a Florida Corp. v. Emery Air Freight Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Kaskel, Dana v. Northern Trust CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003