Legal Opinion
Johnson & Dealaman, Inc. v. Wm. F. Hegarty, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 25, 1966PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
93 N.J. Super. 14 (1966)
JOHNSON & DEALAMAN, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WM. F. HEGARTY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT, AND NORWALK TRUCK LINES, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 3, 1966.
Decided November 25, 1966.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.
Mr. John J. O'Donnell argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Egan, O'Donnell, Hanley & Clifford, attorneys).
Mr. Hilton P. Goldman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Krowen, D'Amico & Chernin, attorneys).
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StarbirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Guzman v. City of Perth AmboyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Lopez v. Ins. Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Waite v. DoeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Pitman Manufacturing Co. v. Centropolis Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Cwiklinski v. BurtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.