Legal Opinion

Haase v. City of Eugene

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1987No. 16-83-03002; CA A38327PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.

Plaintiff alleges that defendant’s police officers assaulted and beat him. He seeks damages from the city, rather than from the officers, for the alleged assault. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant without stating its reasons on the record. 1 Plaintiff appeals. We reverse.

Plaintiff brought this action under the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA). 2 Although his complaint is not a model of clarity and purports to state only a single claim for relief, it can be construed to state claims both under 42 USC § 1983s and for common law assault and battery. We address each…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Collins v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Brungardt v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bray v. American Property Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Schrunk v. MetzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Bray v. American Property Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Rogers v. SaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Rogers v. SaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API