Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Schrunk v. Metz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 22, 1993No. A9003-01559; CA A70486PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.
The issue in this appeal is the legality of the seizure for forfeiture of the corporate assets of Rene Duane Varin’s (claimant) two restaurants 1 pursuant to Oregon Laws 1989, chapter 791, 2 and Portland City Code (PCC) 14.90.040. 3 At the forfeiture proceeding, claimant asserted by counterclaim that: (1) the seizure and retention of the corporate property rendered the state and the City of Portland (plaintiffs) liable in tort for conversion; (2) the seizure and retention of the property constituted an impermissible “taking” of property in violation of Article I, section 18, of the Oregon…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Waiste v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JeffersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Robertson v. City of TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999