Seay v. Davis
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The question is whether the chancellor was right in holding that the plaintiff-appellants were not entitled to accelerate the maturity of a note and mortgage because of the debtors ’ 48-hour delay in tendering the amount of the third monthly installment. We hold that the chancellor was right.
On April 8, 1968, Seay and his wife sold the Rose Haven Motel in El Dorado to the appellees, E. T. Davis and his son, T. G. Davis, for $185,000. The Davises made a down payment of $30,000 and gave a note and mortgage for the remainder, payable in monthly installments of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Johnson v. Guaranty Bank Trust CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
3Cited by16 opinions
- Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Bowen v. DannaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Rawhide Farms, Inc. v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
- Schulte v. Benton Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. GeeslinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.