Legal Opinion

Rawhide Farms, Inc. v. Darby

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 26, 1979No. CA 79-145PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

This suit is for judgment on two promissory notes and foreclosure of a mortgage which secured the indebtedness evidenced by the notes. The chancellor found the appellants, who were the makers of the notes, were in default, and a foreclosure sale was ordered. The appellants appealed to the Arkansas Supreme Court, alleging the chancellor erred in failing to grant a continuance, in finding the appellants in default, and in allowing an inequitable acceleration pursuant to an acceleration clause in the mortgage. The case was assigned to the Court of Appeals according to Rule…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Hazen v. City of BoonevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Allen v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Benson v. BensonNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Massey v. TyraSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp. v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Bowen v. DannaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Postal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FreelCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  4. Johnson v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  5. National Bank of Commerce of El Dorado v. McMullan (In Re McMullan)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API