Bowen v. Danna
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
This “foreclosure” suit is for acceleration of the maturity of a debt evidenced by a promissory note, for judgment on that promissory note, for judgment on the amount the mortgagees paid for an insurance policy to protect the security and for foreclosure of the mortgage securing the debt. The appellees, the Dannas, sold their home in Eureka Springs to James A. Bowen and appellant Dixie Bowen. As a part of the consideration the Bowens executed a promissory note and a mortgage which contained clauses providing for acceleration of maturity in the event of default. Prior…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moose v. GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- In Re Foreclosure of Sutton Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Sharp County v. Northeast Arkansas Planning & Consulting Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Ragge v. BryanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Seay v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peoples Bank and Trust Company v. CermackMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Abrego v. United Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Aycock Pontiac, Inc. v. AycockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Arkansas-Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. Lukis Stewart Price Forbes & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Troutt v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.