Legal Opinion

Schulte v. Benton Savings & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 31, 1983No. 83-74PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The issue in this case involves the enforceability of a “due on sale” clause in a mortgage where the mortgagee is a state chartered savings and loan association. The case is certified to us by the Court of Appeals pursuant to the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, Rule 29 (1) (c) and (4) (d).

In 1977, the appellant Ballard Construction Company executed a promissory note payable to the appellee and secured by a mortgage on commercial real property. Included in the mortgage contract was the following due on sale clause:(j) Acceleration. The maturity of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Seay v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Leslie v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  5. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Abrego v. United Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Hughes v. Segal Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1986
  3. Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Smith v. St. Paul Guardian InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1985
  5. Worthen Bank & Trust Co. v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API