Legal Opinion

Overgard v. Cambridge Book Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 23, 1988No. Nos. 87-2799, 87-2830PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.

In this case, the defendant (Cambridge) appeals from the district court’s entry of judgment on a jury verdict finding that the defendant willfully violated the Age Dis*372crimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (ADEA), in terminating the plaintiffs employment. The district court entered a supplemental judgment denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and granting the plaintiffs application for attorney’s fees. The plaintiff cross-appeals from the district court’s judgment on the amount of damages. We affirm the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Philip R. Visser v. Packer Engineering Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Jardien v. Winston Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. James F. Smith v. General Scanning, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Gabe Kaimowitz v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois and Its Institute of Communications ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API