Legal Opinion
Jardien v. Winston Network, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 31, 1989No. Nos. 88-2700, 88-3437 and 89-1153PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Andrew Jardien sued defendant, Winston Media Network (“Winston”),1 under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (“ADEA”). After a jury trial and verdict for the plaintiff, the district court awarded Jardien stipulated damages of $39,673.00. The district court denied Winston’s motions for a new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Jardien was then allowed to file an updated attorneys’ fees petition for time spent on post-trial motions. The district court awarded Jardien the full amount of his requested fees of $76,046.00…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Philip R. Visser v. Packer Engineering Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Rosario v. LivaditisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Nicholas A. CHIARAMONTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FASHION BED GROUP, INC., a DIVISION OF LEGGETT & PLATT, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Patricia Hennessy v. Penril Datacomm Networks, Incorporated and Richard BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.