Legal Opinion
Miotke v. Spokane County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 20, 2014No. 44121-7-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohanson, J.
¶1 After Spokane County (County) expanded its comprehensive plan’s “Urban Growth Area” (UGA), property owners in the newly expanded UGA commenced urban development. Kathy Miotke and the Neighborhood Alliance of Spokane (collectively Miotke) petitioned the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (Board) for review of the County’s expansion. The Board found the County’s UGA expansion invalid under the Growth Management Act (GMA), ch. 36.70A RCW. In an attempt to address the invalidity determination, the County passed a resolution that repealed the UGA expansion resolution. Based on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Quadrant Corp. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Quadrant Corp. v. STATE, GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Heritage Baptist Church v. Central Puget Sound Growth ManagementCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Kitsap Co & Kitsap Co Sheriff, Resps v. Kitsap Co Correctional Officers Guild & PercCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Spokane County v. Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Friends Of Clark County And Futurewise, V Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Spokane County v. Eastern Washington Growth MgmtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.