Legal Opinion
Bridgers v. City of Lampasas
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 31, 1923No. 6665. [fn*]PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKey, C. J.
The nature and result of this suit is stated as follows in appellant’s brief:
“This suit, being one for injunction, was instituted by the appellees, R. W. Bridgers and others, as property tax paying citizens of the city of Lampasas, for the purpose of having declared invalid two' certain contracts for permanent street improvement, and the warrants issued and to be issued securing the indebtedness attempted to be created thereby.
“It was alleged: That the city of Lampasas is a municipal corporation existing under the general laws of the state of Texas applicable to cities of more than 1,000…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Claiborne County v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lasater v. LopezTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- City of Terrell v. DessaintTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Tyler v. L. L. Jester & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1904
- Police Jury v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Payne v. First Nat. Bank of ColumbusTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- San Antonio River Authority v. ShepperdTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Adams v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Miller Surfacing Co. v. BridgersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Adams v. Rockwall CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.