Legal Opinion

Miller Surfacing Co. v. Bridgers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1924No. 6772PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaugh, J.

On November 18, 1922, R. W. Bridgers et al., alleging themselves to be taxpaying citizens of the city of Lampasas, applied to the district judge of Lampasas county for a writ of injunction restraining the city of Lampasas, its mayor, board of aldermen, and secretary from carrying out an alleged illegal contract made by the city of Lampasas with the Miller Surfacing Company to pave certain streets in that city. The court in chambers on that date granted the writ as prayed for, enjoining the defendants from issuing or delivering any warrants to Miller Surfacing Company, in payment for paving…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hermann v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Mexican National Railway Co. v. MussetteTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. City of Yonkers v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Lancaster v. FitchTexas Supreme Court · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. Somerset Development Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. Wyoming Bancorporation v. BonhamWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Johnson v. McMahanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Serrallés Galiano v. Saurí TristaniSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API