Legal Opinion

Payne v. First Nat. Bank of Columbus

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1927No. 615—4116PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.

On November 28, 1916, an .election; was held for the purpose of incorporating North- Pleasanton as a “town or village” under'the general law. A majority of the votes east in the election were favorable to incorporating. Returns of the election were duly made and canvassed, and the proper entries • and record made declaring the town a corporation. The holding of the election, making and canvassing the returns, and declaring the incorporation of the town, were in all things regular and in conformity to statutory requirements. In due time the corporation was organized by the election of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  4. Mobile v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Graham v. City of GreenvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1886

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. City of San Angelo v. DeutschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Houston v. FinnTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. City of Del Rio v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Keel v. PulteTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. State Ex Rel. Fidelity Life Ass'n v. City of Cedar KeysSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API