Legal Opinion

San Antonio River Authority v. Shepperd

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1957No. A-5940PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCall

This is an original proceeding for mandamus instituted in the Supreme Court by the San Antonio River Authority, hereinafter called the “District,” against John Ben Shepperd, Attorney General of Texas, to compel him to approve an issue of $1,000,-000 of San Antonio River Authority Revenue Bonds, Series 1956.

Because of extensive damage done by floods of the San Antonio River in Bexar County, the Legislature in 1939 created “a Conservation and Reclamation District to be known as ‘San Antonio River Authority’ * * * and consisting of that part of the State of Texas which is included in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. County of Mitchell v. City National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Lasater v. LopezTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Harris County Flood Control District v. MannTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Roper v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Stevenson v. BlakeTexas Supreme Court · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Grimes County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Texas Municipal Power AgencyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Brazos River Authority v. CarrTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Gallagher Headquarters Ranch Development, Ltd. v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
  4. Lee v. Commissioners' Court of Jefferson CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2000
  5. Gallagher Headquarters Ranch Development, Ltd., Christopher Hill and Julie Hooper v. City of San Antonio, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API