Legal Opinion

State v. Schneider

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1996No. Criminal 950368PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

Leroy Schneider appeals a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of criminal trespass. He argues the trial court’s jury instruction on reasonable doubt was erroneous, thus requiring reversal of his conviction. We affirm the conviction.

Schneider was tried by a jury for assault and criminal trespass. Using the North Dakota pattern jury instruction, the trial court instructed the jury on reasonable doubt as follows:

“PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The State must prove all of the essential elements of the crime charged by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. AsbridgeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. JahnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Zander v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API