Legal Opinion

State v. Jahner

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2003No. 20020143PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Joseph Paul Jahner (“Jahner”) appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of negligent homicide, reckless endangerment, and driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. We conclude Jahner waived his right to object to the trial court’s procedure in responding to the jury’s request, during deliberations, for a transcript of Jahner’s testimony; the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on the definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt; and the jury verdict is not legally inconsistent. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2]…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. AshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. KruckenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. ParisienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. BecirajNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. JacobNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API