State v. Jahner
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Joseph Paul Jahner (“Jahner”) appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of negligent homicide, reckless endangerment, and driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. We conclude Jahner waived his right to object to the trial court’s procedure in responding to the jury’s request, during deliberations, for a transcript of Jahner’s testimony; the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on the definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt; and the jury verdict is not legally inconsistent. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2]…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. AshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. KruckenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ParisienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BecirajNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. JacobNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.