Legal Opinion

United States v. Fields, Thomas

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 12, 2001No. 99-3138, 99-3139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:

In United States v. Fields, 242 F.3d 393 (D.C.Cir.2001) (“Fields V), issued on March 13, 2001, the sentences of defendants Thomas “Woozie” Fields and Bernard “Tadpole” Johnson were vacated and the case was remanded to the District Court for resentencing. The Government now petitions for rehearing, claiming that Fields I misapplied Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), in holding “the jury was required to find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendants were responsible for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. DoggettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Richard Dale Talbott, Applicant v. State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Both v. Ashby, MDDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
  2. Emerick v. SchmittDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
  3. Jackson v. RKW ResidentialDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API