Emerick v. Schmitt
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 24-cv-22139-ALTMAN/Sanchez WILLIAM GALE EMERICK, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN SCHMITT, et al., Defendants. ___________________________/ ORDER “Federal courts have an obligation to examine sua sponte their own jurisdiction over a case, notwithstanding the contentions of the parties.” DeRoy v. Carnival Corp., 963 F.3d 1302, 1311 (11th Cir. 2020) (citing Univ. of S. Ala. v. Am. Tobacco Co.,
168 F.3d 405, 410
(11th Cir. 1999)). Having conducted a sua sponte review of the Complaint [ECF No. 1], we conclude that William Gale Emerick, our…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- GJR Investments, Inc. v. County of EscambiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.