Legal Opinion

Richard Dale Talbott, Applicant v. State of Indiana

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 7, 2000No. 00-3080, 00-3085PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Richard Talbott is among the throngs of state and federal prisoners who believe that Apprendi v. New Jersey, U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), undermines their sentences. Prisoners who already have filed and lost a collateral attack need this court’s approval to launch another. Not one of the Ap- prendi-based applications for permission to file has been granted, however, and none is going to be granted in the near future, for a fundamental reason: a new decision of the Supreme Court justifies a second or successive collateral attack only if it…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. United States v. Larry D. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. People v. CrespoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United States v. Wendell Nance, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Donald BehrmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Paul Thomas KinterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API