Legal Opinion

United States v. Doggett

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 9, 2000No. 99-50380PublishedCited by 234 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Rodney Sloan Doggett and Dunois “Dee” T. Beman challenge their convictions and sentences for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute and conspiracy, in particular the constitutionality of treating drug quantities as a sentencing factor rather than an element of the underlying crime. Their appeal requires us to apply the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Apprendi held that “[ojther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. Kayle NordbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by234 opinions

  1. United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Ramse ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Marion Promise, A/K/A Mario,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Wendell Nance, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API