Legal Opinion

Kidder v. Hall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1923No. 3866PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This is an original action for mandamus against the Commissioner of Insurance and Banking and the State Banking Board, to compel the former, (a) to allow a claim against the Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Ranger, an insolvent State bank; (b) to classfy the claim as a noninterest-bearing and unsecured deposit; and (c) to require the State Banking Board to pay the claim thus allowed and classified out of the Depositors’ Guaranty Fund provided for by the banking laws of the State.

On October 24, 1921, E. A. Estes purchased, in the usual way, from the Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Ranger,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Arberry v. BeaversTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Screwmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. BensonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Elliott v. Capital City State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Board of Fire & Water Commissioners v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Ewing v. CohenTexas Supreme Court · 1885

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Guaranty State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Texas Liquor Control Board v. Continental Distilling Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Woolsey v. Security Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  4. Priest v. Whitney Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. State Banking Board v. PilcherTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API