Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 20, 1993No. CA A76166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole order that sustained his judicially imposed minimum sentence. We affirm.

Petitioner was convicted of murder in 1985. The court set his minimum sentence at 25 years. A unanimous vote of the Board is required to override a minimum sentence for murder. ORS 163.115(3)(d). At petitioner’s 1992 hearing, three of the four Board members voted not to override the minimum sentence, citing the seriousness of petitioner’s crime.

Petitioner contends that the seriousness of the crime was made a ground for sustaining a minimum sentence by a 1988 amendment to OAR…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Thierman v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Halladay v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API