Legal Opinion

Halladay v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 2009No. A138293Published

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Petitioner challenges the validity of four administrative rules pursuant to ORS 183.400. The rules in question— OAR 255-030-0026, OAR 255-032-0015, OAR 255-035-0023(1), and OAR 255-040-0025—concern aspects of parole hearings for inmates convicted of murder and aggravated murder. Petitioner contends that those rules are unconstitutional because they treat individuals convicted of aggravated murder more favorably than individuals convicted of murder. We conclude that petitioner’s challenges depend on specific factual situations that may or may not arise under the rules, and we therefore reject…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. AFSCME Local 2623 v. Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fleming v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Carroll v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API