Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Board of Parole

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1987No. CA A41329; SC S33869PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*620JONES, J.

Petitioner seeks review in this court, alleging that the notice of the action of the Board of Parole (Board) to prisoners does not satisfy ORS 144.135. The statute requires the Board to provide written bases to prisoners of its decisions. ORS 144.135 provides:

“The board shall state in writing the detailed bases of its decisions under ORS 144.110 to 144.125.”1

Petitioner also claims that the challenged order of the Board “fails to meet the standards established by the Attorney General’s Model Rules of Procedure under the Administrative Procedures Act.”

Petitioner pled guilty to two…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Jenkins v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Jarvis v. State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Jeldness v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Calderon-Pacheco v. State Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API