Legal Opinion
Dodoo v. Seagate Technology, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 15, 2000No. 99-6352PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHADUR, District Judge.
Branford Dodoo (“Dodoo”) sued Seagate Technology, Inc. (“Seagate”), charging that Seagate’s denial of his applications for promotion to no fewer than nine different jobs during 1997 stemmed from several types of discrimination — discrimination based on his age, race and national origin — in violation of state and federal law. Before trial the district court granted summary judgment for Seagate on a host of Dodoo’s claims: on all those arising under the Oklahoma Anti-Discrimination Act, on all federal claims based on two of the promotion decisions and on Dodoo’s Age…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Phillips v. Hillcrest Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Miller v. EBY Realty Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Harrison v. Eddy Potash, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Stroup v. United AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Nalder v. West Park HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.