Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Hillcrest Medical Center
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 26, 2001No. 00-5013PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELOT, District Judge.
Appellants filed this action alleging federal and supplemental Oklahoma state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1367(a). Prior to submitting the case to the jury, the district court granted appellee’s Rule 50 motion as to the federal claim. The jury returned a verdict in appellee’s favor with respect to the supplemental state law claim. The appeal of the district court’s final judgment is now properly before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Facts
On Wednesday, September 23,1998, Martin Shane Phillips, accompanied by his friend and co-worker…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Deters v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Williams v. W.D. Sports, N.M., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Turnbull v. Topeka State HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Somerlott v. Cherokee Nation Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Quigley v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.