Hausauer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Dan Hausauer appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Workers Compensation Bureau order dismissing his claim for benefits. The Bureau could have reasonably reached its factual conclusion that Hau-sauer willfully made false statements in connection -with Ms claim. We, therefore, affirm the decision.
I
[¶ 2] On November 14, 1995, Hausauer injured Ms spine as a result of a fall while employed by Coca-Cola as a route merchandiser. On November 30, 1995, Hausauer filed an imtial “Worker’s Claim For Injury” form for workers’ compensation benefits. Because Hausauer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- F.O.E. Aerie 2337 v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Dean v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Lucier v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by30 opinions
- Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Hopfauf v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Vernon v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Snyder v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Renault v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.