Legal Opinion

Hausauer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1997No. Civil 970128PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dan Hausauer appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Workers Compensation Bureau order dismissing his claim for benefits. The Bureau could have reasonably reached its factual conclusion that Hau-sauer willfully made false statements in connection -with Ms claim. We, therefore, affirm the decision.

I

[¶ 2] On November 14, 1995, Hausauer injured Ms spine as a result of a fall while employed by Coca-Cola as a route merchandiser. On November 30, 1995, Hausauer filed an imtial “Worker’s Claim For Injury” form for workers’ compensation benefits. Because Hausauer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. F.O.E. Aerie 2337 v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Dean v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Lucier v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hopfauf v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Vernon v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Snyder v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Renault v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API