Dean v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Mari Dean appealed from a judgment affirming a Workers Compensation Bureau order dismissing her claim for benefits. The Bureau could reasonably have reached its factual conclusion that Dean intentionally made material false statements in connection with her claim, and we affirm.
[¶ 2] Dean was employed as a claims analyst by the Bureau. On June 28,1994, Dean, while sitting in her chair at work, turned to put a stack of files on her desk. Dean felt “something loek[] in my back by my bra strap and I felt pain.” Dean was unable to move and was taken to the hospital by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vetter v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- F.O.E. Aerie 2337 v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Lucier v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Vines v. Champion Building ProductsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Hausauer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Hopfauf v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Vernon v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Renault v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.