Legal Opinion
Murphy v. General Electric Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided January 16, 2003No. 1:00-mj-00269PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
HOMER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Felix J. Murphy (“Murphy”) brought this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621; the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.; and New York state law alleging in three causes of action that he was transferred and then terminated from his employment with defendant General Electric Company (“GE”) because of his age. Am. Compl. (Docket No. 14) at ¶¶ 21, 24-26, 29-30. Murphy seeks declaratory and injunctive relief as well as compensatory and…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Bailey v. SynthesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003