Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Synthes
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 16, 2003No. 00 CIV.7880 LTS JCFPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
SWAIN, District Judge.
Defendants in this employment discrimination case move pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiffs claims. By a separate motion, all defendants other than Synthes (USA) move pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order dismissing the complaint as against them for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
In her complaint, Plaintiff asserts that Defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, as amended (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C.A.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brady v. Calyon Securities (USA)District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Kearney v. ABN AMRO, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Baker v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2008
- Fernandez v. Mac Motors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Erazo-Vazquez v. State Industrial Products CorporationDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.