Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Oles
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 22, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 9, 2003, as amended by decision filed December 30, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive *1189unemployment insurance benefits and a trade readjustment allowance under the federal Trade Act of 1974 (see 19 USC § 2271 et seq.) because he was not totally unemployed during the time that he received those…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of AcabeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of SarubbiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of ZegelboneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of BrinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of ChiricoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of IbrahimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of SpinningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006