McManus v. Nichols-Chisholm Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Becker county to recover $10,400 for personal injuries. After tbe former appeal, 105 Minn. 144 (117 N. W. 223), tbe case was tried before Taylor, «L, and a jury wbicb rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding tbe verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is tbe second appeal in tbis case. See McManus v. Nicbols-Chisholm Lumber Co., 105 Minn. 144, 117 N. W. 223, to wbicb reference is here made for a general statement of tbe case. Tbe result of tbe second trial was a verdict for tbe plaintiff, which was in these words: “Wé, tbe jury impaneled and sworn in tbe entitled action, find for tbe plaintiff and assess bis damages in tbe sum of $3,700, three thousand seven hundred and no/100 dollars; and we further find that tbe injury was caused by tbe negligence of (defendant) Nichols-Chisholm Lumber Company, by tbe engineer and section foreman.”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Meyers v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- McManus v. Nichols-Chisholm Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Rogers v. Clark Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- Costello v. GleesonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Lundgren v. Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- American Bridge Co. v. HonstainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Paine v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Schmidt v. RiemenschneiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.