Legal Opinion

Lundgren v. Union Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1927No. 25,932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action upon a contractors’ bond wherein defendants Carlstad were the principals and defendant Union Indemnity Company the surety. After trial without a jury and a decision for plaintiffs, defendant surety appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The assignments of error all go to the exclusion of certain telegrams and a letter, all sent from Duluth to the home office of the surety at New Orleans, supposedly by plaintiffs. They were offered by the surety in support of the claim that it was induced to execute the bond by false representations on the part of plaintiffs. Without…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hill v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Selover v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Cobb v. Glenn Boom & Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Melby v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HuffmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. United States v. Alexander SuttonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Merchants National Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. State v. MilumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API