Legal Opinion

Beyer v. Tp. Committee of the Tp. of Mt. Holly

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 1, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Township Committee enacted an ordinance amending the ordinance creating the Mount Holly Sewerage Authority. The amendment effected a repealer of the provision of the original ordinance governing the annual compensation of Authority members. Motion for judgment on the pleadings has been made in this proceeding in lieu of certiorari by plaintiffs, members of the Authority, who contend the amending ordinance is wholly void because without the power of defendant Township Committee to enact.

The motion is granted. The ordinance is a nullity for the reason that the Township Committee, in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goszler v. Corporation of GeorgetownSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Mayor of Hoboken v. GearSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1859
  3. Thompson v. City of MarionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Brown v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Simpson v. State ex rel. EislerIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Krieger v. City of JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Edgewater Park v. Edgewater Park Housing Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  3. Witt v. Gloucester County Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. Santoro v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF BOROUGH SO. PLAINFIELDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. BD. OF REC. COMM'RS, BOROUGH OF RUTHERFORD v. Borough of RutherfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API