Legal Opinion

Santoro v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF BOROUGH SO. PLAINFIELD

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 28, 1959PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

57 N.J. Super. 498 (1959)

155 A.2d 23

ANGELO SANTORO, INDIVIDUALLY AND THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY CORPORATE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD AND THE COUNTY CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued and Decided October 21, 1959.

Opinion Filed October 28, 1959.

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and FOLEY.

Mr. Baruch S. Seidman argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Angelo H. Dalto, attorney).

Mr. Eugene P. Taylor argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Joseph…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Botkin v. Mayor & Borough Council of WestwoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. County of Camden v. Pennsauken Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Botkin v. Mayor and Borough Council of WestwoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Beyer v. Tp. Committee of the Tp. of Mt. HollyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. HACKENSACK BD. OF EDUCATION v. City of HackensackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Jersey City, Etc., Auth'y. v. Housing, Etc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Camden County ClerkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  4. Darrah v. Township of EveshamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  5. New Jersey State AFL-CIO v. Bergen County Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API