Legal Opinion

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 4, 1934No. M-343PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHALEY, Judge.

This is a suit for an admitted overpayment of income tax for 1922,. and the question involved is whether a timely and sufficient claim was filed under which recovery may be had. The facts are not in dispute.

Plaintiff duly filed its return for 1922 and paid the tax shown due thereon in installments; the last installment of $100',090 being paid December 14, 1923'. Within the four-year statutory period for filing claims for refund after the aforementioned payment, namely, November 3, 1926; plaintiff filed a formal claim for refund for 1923 on form 843 for $20,417.82., “or such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. Factors & Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pacific Mills v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
  3. New York Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. Andrews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  5. Con. P. Curran Printing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API