Legal Opinion

United States v. Andrews

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 3, 1938No. 48PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

In this case we are called upon to determine whether a claim for refund of income tax, asking repayment of sJ definite sum upon a specific ground, is susceptible of untimely amendment to recover a greater sum on a new and unrelated ground.

The respondent, on behalf of the estate she represented, paid the income tax shown to be due by her return, which exhibited an item of gross income of $110,891 as “dividends from domestic corporations.” Of this total $36,750 was erroneously reported as dividends from the M. A. Hanna Company. This amount was paid her pursuant to a recapitalization of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. Factors & Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. Blum Folding Paper Box Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  2. Computervision Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Joanna Cotton Mills Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  4. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. PattersonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962
  5. Pink v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API