Legal Opinion

Andrews v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 8, 1937No. 43181PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHALEY, Judge.

This is a suit to recover an admitted overpayment of income tax for 1930 wherein the Government defends on the ground that such payment cannot be made for the reason that a timely claim for refund cannot be amended, after the period for filing á claim has expired, which Sets up a new ground for recovery.

Plaintiff duly filed her return for 1930 and paid the tax of $12,800.30 shown due thereon in quarterly installments, the last installment being paid on December 15, 1931. During 1930 plaintiff, pursuant to a recapitalization arrangement, exchanged stock in a corporation in which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. United States v. Factors & Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. RieckCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. Mohawk Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  3. Marks v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
  4. Winchester Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API