Legal Opinion

Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 13, 1933No. 515PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo

The controversy to be determined presents another phase of a problem which has been much considered by the court in opinions recently announced. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co., 288 U.S. 62; United States v. Prentiss & Co., 288 U.S. 73; United States v. Factors & Finance Co., 288 U.S. 89. There is need once again to decide whether a claim for the refund of a tax has been presented by the taxpayer in such a form as to be subject to amendment after a claim wholly new would be barred by limitation.

The petitioner, Bemis Bro. Bag Company, having made payment of excess profits taxes for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. Factors & Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Crocker v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API