Smazal v. Estate of Dassow

23 Wis.2d 336 (1964)

SMAZAL, Appellant,

v.

ESTATE OF DASSOW, Respondent.[*]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 4, 1964.

March 31, 1964.

For the appellant there was a brief by Nikolay, Jensen & Scott of Colby, and oral argument by Frank L. Nikolay.

For the respondent there was a brief by Giles & Krug of Medford, and oral argument by Charles G. Giles.

GORDON, J.

In sustaining the demurrer to the complaint of Clara Smazal, the trial court determined that the alleged contract between Clara Smazal and the putative father did not conform to the provisions of sec. 52.28, Stats. We agree with that conclusion.

In…