Legal Opinion

Francken v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

It is earnestly argued by the attorneys representing the State that the Municipal Court Act of Brown County does not provide for a change of venue in the trial of a bastardy proceeding. Proceedings for change *427of venue are statutory in their origin, and where no statutory provision exists authorizing a change the right thereto is non-existent. It has been the settled law of this state since the case of Baker v. State, 56 Wis. 568, 14 N. W. 718, that a proceeding against a defendant for bastardy is neither a criminal nor a civil action, and that it is classed under the head of a special…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Iron Silver Mining Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Humphreys v. McCallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Perrin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Smith v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tucker v. State Ex Rel. SnowWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Bednarik v. BednarikNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  3. W.R.W. v. BartholomewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. J. M. S. Ex Rel. Webb v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In re BolmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API