Legal Opinion

Chippewa Valley Securities Co. v. Herbst

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1938PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

It is conceded that if sec. 270.69, Stats., as construed by this court in Park Hotel Co. v. Eckstein-Miller Auto Co. 181 Wis. 72, 193 N. W. 998; United Finance Corp. v. Peterson, 208 Wis. 104, 241 N. W. 337; Shawano Finance Corp. v. Julius, 214 Wis. 637, 254 N. W. 355; Wisconsin Sales Corp. v. McDougal, 223 Wis. 485, 271 N. W. 25, is constitutional, then this controversy is ruled by these cases; but the plaintiff contends here, as it did in the court below, that sec. 270.69, as construed by this court, (1) violates sec. 12, art. I, of the constitution of this state, and (2) art. XIV of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Sloane v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Farquhar & Co. v. DehavenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Western Pattern & Manufacturing Co. v. American Metal Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Kahn v. LesserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kealey Pharmacy & Home Care Service, Inc. v. Walgreen Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982
  2. Home Bank v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Laskaris v. City of Wisconsin Dells, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  4. Wunnicke v. LeithWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Halbach v. HalbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API