Legal Opinion
Conley v. Barton
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 29, 1923No. 193PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Suit to. redeem from a mortgage which was executed by defendant in error to one George W. Towle to secure his promissory note for the payment to Towle-of the sum of $2,000 and interest. The note and mortgage were dated October 14,1905.
On February 20,’ 1919, a breach of the mortgage was committed and the holder of it, under the laws of the State, foreclosed it by taking possession of the mortgaged premises and duly recorded a certificate of the fact in the Registry of Deeds of the proper county.. The bill ás originally drawn was based upon an alleged effort to redeem the mortgaged premises by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Vance v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Curtis v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Oshkosh Waterworks Co. v. OshkoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Barton v. ConleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sveen v. MelinSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Shriver v. Woodbine Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Evans v. FinleyOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Gregg v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Portland Savings Bank v. LandrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.