Legal Opinion

Vicino v. Amador

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1925No. Docket No. 5002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

Plaintiff filed a complaint, the defendant filed a cross-complaint, and after issue joined on each of those pleadings the parties went to trial before the court sitting with a jury. Judgment went for the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed.

The respondents make a preliminary objection to the appeal being heard on the record which is before us. A proper understanding of that objection requires the statement of these preliminary matters: The verdict was filed February 14th, the judgment was entered February 15th, and notice of intention to move for a new trial was filed February 19th, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tieman v. Red Top Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Adrian v. GuyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Cannis v. Di Salvo Trucking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Adams v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Callaway v. WolcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API