Vicino v. Amador
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
Plaintiff filed a complaint, the defendant filed a cross-complaint, and after issue joined on each of those pleadings the parties went to trial before the court sitting with a jury. Judgment went for the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed.
The respondents make a preliminary objection to the appeal being heard on the record which is before us. A proper understanding of that objection requires the statement of these preliminary matters: The verdict was filed February 14th, the judgment was entered February 15th, and notice of intention to move for a new trial was filed February 19th, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tieman v. Red Top Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Adrian v. GuyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Cannis v. Di Salvo Trucking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Adams v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Callaway v. WolcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.