Legal Opinion

Cannis v. Di Salvo Trucking Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1952No. Civ. 15086PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Percy A. Cannis brought this action to recover for personal injuries suffered by him in a collision between his automobile and a truck operated by Thomas P. Hamby, then working in the course and scope of his employ ment with the Di Salvo Trucking Company. The jury returned verdicts in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

Appellant’s main argument is that the trial court committed prejudicial error in instructing on the law applicable to making “U” turns in residential and business districts, without also giving the jury the statutory definitions of such districts. He also points out that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mehollin v. YsuchiyamaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Ketchum v. PatteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Hamm v. San Joaquin & Kings River Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Adrian v. GuyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Vicino v. AmadorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. EppsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Dayton v. LandonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Martens v. Redi-Spuds, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Coe v. Kings County Truck LineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Dayton v. LandonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API