Legal Opinion

Jack A. Smith v. James C. Skakel

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1971No. 21038_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Smith appeals from dismissal of his suit for violation of con tract after service was finally made upon the defendant some nine and one-half years after the cause of action accrued.

Federal jurisdiction in this case is based upon diversity of citizenship and, hence, the Michigan Statute of Limitations of six years is concededly applicable. Mich.Comp.Laws § 600.5807(8) (1963). Appellant, however, contends that since the suit was filed one day prior to the running of the six years, service of process (even three and one-half years later) serves to toll the statute of limitations if…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Guastello v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Yeager v. MellusMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gleason v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. GLEASON v. McBRIDECourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Gustav WahlCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  4. Tanner v. Presidents-First Lady Spa, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1972
  5. Wilbur Dewey v. Roland FarchoneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API