Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Mellus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1950No. Docket 81, Calendar 44,744PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

Plaintiff: filed a declaration, with notice to plead indorsed thereon, to recover damages for libel, and 100 days later caused service of a copy of the declaration and notice to plead, to be made on defendant. Defendant made a motion to quash the service because of claimed discontinuity of the suit, and to dismiss the case as barred by the statute of limitations. From an order denying his motion, the defendant appeals.

Plaintiff: claims that where a declaration with notice to plead is filed, there is no limitation established within which service must be made except the statute as to dismissal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colling v. McGregorMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Home Savings Bank v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Christe v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Danaher v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. City of Menominee v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Guastello v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Hammel v. BettisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Blaha v. A. H. Robins & Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982
  4. Jack A. Smith v. James C. SkakelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. Hamill v. JenksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API